reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the
The Law, Government, Truth & Spiritual
The Law, Government, Truth & Spiritual
RIGHT IS CROOKED
… It is not straightforward or easy for
someone who is a deprived citizen in a Christian society to institute a lawsuit
in case of alleged injustice in order to be put in the right or to claim
… In the absence of money for the expenses
that come with a lawsuit, the less fortunate is as good as lost.
… And when a citizen in his right to redress
can not freely appeal to the legal aid where every time a piece of cake goes
off or is cut back by the government, the poor man is at the mercy of the
whimpers of the sharks in human form. These are the interested natural persons
and the legal entities.
…… Yet the
government still dares to speak about equal rights in a democracy in this
hypocritical religious society, which in reality is still far to be found here.
… In fact, this amounts to “false rights.”
And sham rights include laws and regulations, which the government has devised
to mislead citizens legally.
… Furthermore, a pro-deo regulation or
addition does not cover all litigation costs, so that only people with money
often have the most chance of succeeding in obtaining his right in this
… And then there is the question of whether
for someone who is in his right also right is spoken to satisfaction because
“right” is usually just as “crooked” as the Bible, the
Koran and other holy books from which one learns to be a bad person, rather
than the opposite.
… And as the image expresses of Lady Justice,
she is as blind as a mole and as deaf as a quail, and thus, in reality, can
never speak justice, let alone listen carefully to the point of a case for a
And the legal inequality that emerges everywhere
in a legitimate society is called Christian justice.
… Well, that Christian equality in the
representation of human rights violations in a legality system within the
framework of the laws and regulations of the religious countries is also not to
be found with a lamp.
… And under “justice” is understood
“lawfulness” in a constitutional state, but these two concepts are
diverse in legal power.
The legal aid law that currently still applies
does not cover costs for the minimums, but now the Dutch government threatens
to cut back even more, while the less fortunate people must be protected in
… When the aforementioned austerity measures
continue, it means that there is more injustice for the underprivileged Dutch
… This is from the crazy !?
In other words, the Dutch government intends to
afford even more injustice to its citizens than it has and always has done.
For this, look at the working methods of the
rich civilized countries with a democratically elected government, where
“playing your own judge and taking the law into your own hands” is
the order of the day.
… In the Netherlands, for example, socially
vulnerable people are the first to be cut financially by austerity measures in
which law and injustice go together rigorously.
… In this way, the poor civilian people are
ruthlessly pushed deeper and deeper into the misery that they were already, and
their social or personal situation is not taken into account at all.
The government, which should be for the
bourgeoisie, actually gives the bad example to the population, because in
crucial government negotiations it takes the law into its own hands in advance.
… In doing so, the self-taken decisions are
carried out unilaterally, so without having properly consulted its subjects in
accordance with the democratic legal system.
… The government clearly perpetuates mental violence against the bourgeoisie
and legally deals with what belongs to another according to the proposition
“Honesty is the best policy, but stealing is faster!”
Sometimes the government tries to be honest by
ordering a referendum in general dissatisfaction to compensate for their biased
… But if in spite of all the precautionary
measures the result of the referendum in favor of the opposing party has taken
place, then the relevant result was often not taken into account in the final
decision by the ruling elite class.
… So hypocrisy and popular deception at the
… So it happens that national laws and
regulations are applied randomly to the civilian population according to the
changing standards of the government.
… And the elite class almost always emanates
the measures of governance of policymakers, as a result of which the rich get
richer and the poor get poorer.
Justice and Hypocrisy
When an ordinary citizen calls on justice for
urgent legal assistance or for personal protection, protection is often made
impossible by all kinds of law articles.
… As a standard, the needy citizen only experiences protection when he or she
is already wronged or after it has been bled to death.
… So, only after everything has been
escalated, legal measures are taken and the Christian judicial system, so
hypocritical as it is, is rushing into action while avoiding cost and effort to
track down and try the wrongdoers. And this help comes as usual far too late
for the victims.
It is largely unavoidable in the modern
Christian society that “prevention is better than cure”, except when
an interesting situation suits justice or if an influential or well-known
person screams for help, it seems that people can be eligible for emergency aid
by operation of law.
In addition, in a host of cases, criminals are
protected against trial in accordance with all sorts of legal avenues by human
rights huggers, advocates and by bribery of justice.
… That is why, in most cases, the perpetrators
are practically free or come off with a milder punishment than the intention
… In many cases it is usually a matter of
negotiating with the Justice Department in the upper room at the round table in
which way and for how much money the debt or crime can be bought off.
… So the judiciary and justice is just a bad
mess. And those gulls are sitting there on the top floor, all with a smoothed
Christian face, to condone the crime. Of course, “Lady Justice sees
nothing, after all, she is blind.”
… But when the poor criminal has done
something wrong with the rule of law, it is arrested at the least and
slightest, impatiently handcuffed, legally stripped and set as an example for
other poor criminals, because society was seriously shocked by so much badness.
… Suddenly, Lady Justice drains her blindfold
and comes rushing like a wild bull to try the unfortunate criminal.
… Subsequently, Lady Justice, with a
nonchalant gesture, resolutely resigns her scales when her diligent staff
members come up with all sorts of law books, which were first hidden in the
negotiations with the white-collar criminals, in order to encumber their victim
or the poor criminal.
… And with a straight face, and without
showing any emotion, she unscrupulously imposes the harshest punishment on the
poor criminal that can be found in the Penal Code.
… So, when it comes to the common man or to
the petty thief Lady Justice get her sight back as if by magic. Otherwise
not?! Is this not a legal inequality and should the citizen still have
confidence in the legal process and the government?
… The correct answer is “No, nada, never!”
… And as if this is not enough, Lady Justice
also continues to profile herself as an experienced fortune teller.
… Because justice and the Public Prosecution
Service know everything much better than the perpetrators in criminal cases as
if they were standing next to it and experienced the crime in smells and colors.
… But that they have not intervened to prevent this crime only explains how
criminal, unjust, inhuman and sadistic they are themselves! Or, they did not
help to keep their jobs.
However, the victims of the villain who are
still alive do not usually experience the desired satisfaction but are often
blamed by the good breasts in society for the origin of their problem or they
are ignored by the judiciary.
… Protesting usually does not help, as far as
this is still possible, and the dead have no choice anyway and have to take the
decision of Justice.
And bribery is a medieval custom that is
currently in vogue. In the Middle Ages, however, poor wretches were buried
outside the cemetery, but wealthy people inside the church under the floor.
… For this, the rich people had to pay a lot
of money because in this way they thought they would generate a priority
position and be closer to their God. And the churches also made greedy abuse of
… This aforementioned behavior of bribery is
not a secret in today’s society because whoever has money and wants to be
exempt from criminal prosecution has the opportunity to buy off his debt or
loot from the judiciary, and whoever wants to keep his luxury must also pay for
As mentioned earlier, crumb-thieves who do not
have money cannot escape judicial prosecution and are irrevocably deprived.
The money Monsters in the service of the state!
That injustice triumphs many do not want to
acknowledge, but what do you want? We know us because in cases where a victim
is finally acknowledged, rewarded or rehabilitated by justice, this is due to
the righteous eye of public opinion, and not because the judiciary would like
to do so.
… Admitting mistakes made by the jurisdiction
costs the state a lot of money. And in
order to prevent this uninvited expense to the detriment of the rule of law,
the jurisdiction of God and all saints swears in one way or another, by law and
regulations, to impregnate the innocent man lawfully in guilt.
In addition, this democratic legal system
unabashedly frees itself with the reference to the disadvantaged Third World
countries in which injustice, oppression, and corruption form a unity and where
legal errors and abuses in those countries are regarded as the most normal
things in the world.
… With this defense the Christian power tries
to obscure its faults, saying that its mistakes made in comparison with the
abuses in these countries do not represent anything, thus of no significance,
for judicial shortcomings can take place in every legal system!
… Okay, absolutely right in that respect, that
mistakes can occur in every legal system, but the judiciary does not mention in
this case any word about the fait accompli, that it itself is the debit of
these legal errors which occur frequently and that they, out of self-interest,
knowingly made mistakes and applied to the democratic bourgeoisie.
… Are deliberate errors also subject to legal
accidents, or is this only a case of class justice?
It is almost certain that the legislators and/
or the judiciary, at their own discretion, ignore most laws.
… This, while the law books state, that “a constitutional state is a
state in which freedom, legal certainty, and legal equality are very important
to the citizen, in which the citizen also enjoys the protection of his rights
and freedoms, against fellow citizens and against the government.
… The judge determines whether someone has
complied with the law or not, and if someone has violated the law, the judge
can impose a punishment and/ or a ban.”
But if a constitutional state including the
judiciary does not justify justice, but applies lawfulness according to the provisions
in the law books, which can be applied to the citizen and at will, the citizen
can still whistle to his rights.
… This legal defect is also regularly the case.
Not everyone is lucky when it comes to the
arbitrary application by the law, because when justice is done on the basis of
legality, the person whose right is being served may undoubtedly speak of
happiness, but whoever has not experienced this happiness will, in any case,
have a trauma of this legal system.
In its search for justice, in everyday life, the
citizen is legally unscrupulously disadvantaged by the legal system.
… This, while the ruler should dedicate himself to law enforcement and
truth-finding for a just solution for everyone, instead of bullying citizens
with all kinds of restrictive measures.
It often appears in practice that when justice
can find nothing to harm someone, it pretends it does not mean anything,
because “Right” is often as crooked as their law books from which
they learn to be unjust and ruthless towards fellow human beings, compared to
the opposite, because justice is nowhere to be found!
For example, look at the way in which the Dutch
Justice assesses a criminal case.
… When an ex-offender is linked to a criminal
offense, for which he or she has previously undergone detention for a similar
offense, the ex-detainee is confronted almost directly with the recent offense
and is automatically eligible for arrest and imprisonment.
It occurs in 99% of all cases that the judiciary
almost always judges an ex-delinquent out of laziness on the basis of his or
her past, even though the accused person has proven his innocence with a
It is generally very easy to accuse someone
without proof because abuse of power is legally permissible in today’s society
by a detour.
… And witnesses who smell money or sense
benefits can lie like the Bhagavad-Gita and the Bible together.
… It is regrettable, legally permissible, that
someone in their own interests may lie behind the scenes with impunity to blame
or plead a suspect in favor of this, and furthermore, without any evidence, be
allowed to express his allegations and false confessions against the other.
… And the judiciary, in turn, distorts the
truth to lie or vice versa, as long as it fits into their lane and-or with
which the victim can be criminally encumbered and persecuted.
So witnesses can lie as the Torah and humiliate
another as the Talmud, but Police and Justice are often champions of lying and
… A large part of the police is a pathological
liar and the most unreliable witnesses.
… They usually fantasize a lie for their own
good in order to emphasize their so-called anxiety and sense of justice.
… They are ready to force a conviction instead of being independent in their
… They prefer to give you a kick and come up
with all kinds of accusations that someone could not have done. Thus they know
how to tactically shift their own missteps into someone else’s shoes. And I can
all know this because I worked for police and justice for years.
The position of the government and the judiciary
so far is that “crooks are caught with thieves.”
.. This is actually incorrect and inhumane, but
the occasion makes the thief. The
aforementioned statement by the government that “crooks
are caught with thieves” is once more proof that the
government offers a clear opportunity for theft and fraud, so that civil
servants can be caught, to keep the Judicial apparatus running.
… This means that the government and the
judiciary fully acknowledge that civil servants and criminals are standardized
villains who, like believers, are the most unreliable type of people to whom
thoroughness and trust can in no way be measured.”
… In view of the aforementioned, the worldwide
established criminal organization, this is the church, the Vatican in general
and its followers, offers criminals the possibility of canceling their past and
… A large number of these remitted criminals
go to missionary work because they supposedly receive the calling of Jesus and
god. This makes that evil, which is peculiar to religion, spreads among mankind
because religion nourishes and fuels evil so that widespread human rights
violations and genocide will never become a thing of the past.
… And the criminals in question, whether or
not in a government jacket, make horrific abuses worldwide and condemn their
former misdeeds against humanity as the work of God.
This is highly outrageous and criminal, and this
happens in the Netherlands, Nigeria, Surinam, China, Philippines, India,
Colombia, Brazil, in short, wherever religion has a finger in it.
… And the government, claiming that church and
state are separate, cheerfully engages in this in its own way, using its church
law, by interpreting this biblical law according to its own idea and which it
has recorded constitutionally in an adapted form.
… See Romans
1. Let everyone be subject to the governing
authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established.
The authorities that exist have been established by God.
2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the
authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so
will bring judgment on themselves.
3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do
right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one
in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended.
4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for
your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for
no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the
5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the
authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of
6 This is also why you pay taxes, for the
authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing.
7 Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe
taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor,
As Far As The Aforementioned Articles Are Concerned, I Can Only Fully Agree
With The Last Four Words After The Semicolon Of Article 7, On The “Tribute
To Honor.” And Tribute Only Comes To Nature, For Nature Is The Creator Of
Life, “Honor To Whom Honor Is Due!”
… Once again, officials are just like
criminals and believers the most unreliable kind of people where trust, honesty
and all other human virtues are weighed to regularity, which is a fiction of
religious mankind, thus generally speaking injustice.
In order to guarantee the legal safety of fellow
human beings in a legitimate society, an individual and in-depth investigation
must be conducted with a frequency of once in a trimester into the ins and outs
of every police officer, so that fairness, impartiality, truth-finding, proper
behavior towards the bourgeoisie according to justice actually comes into its
… The judiciary, like officials of the
ministry, the cabinet members, the king’s cabinet or the president and the
opposition of the government, must also, from time to time, undergo a similar
test of reliability for proper execution of her social duties to justice for
the benefit of everyone.
… And in the
event of proven unfitness, the person concerned should be kicked out of the
police apparatus or from the judiciary or from the government organization,
without any pardon of persons, and ex officio should be released because rabble
does not belong there.
For the justification for the fair and correct
application of rules and laws to the bourgeoisie, the government apparatus must
be completely cleared of religious and other malevolent human influences.
… I have wondered before, where the judiciary
is getting the guts away from condemning innocent people?
… This, despite psychological reports from
researchers affiliated with the legal system and court of law, in which it is
established that someone is the fact for which he or she is accused is innocent
or at least could not have committed it?
Nevertheless, in most cases the court finds it
necessary to punish innocent people for a very long time and exclude them from
society according to the proposition; “as he is worthy, he trusted his
… This means “that the judiciary sees
others as they see themselves.”
In other words, the judiciary basically does not refer to
“Judiciary”, but to “crooked speech” and “crooked
law.” So Class justice.
It is therefore not unlikely that at least 60%
of detainees in prison are convicted innocent on the basis of civil service
bullshit and judicial process.
… On the other hand, a large number of
convicted people roam free in society, who have committed one or more offenses
and some for very serious offenses of which there is a fear of recidivism, but
for which there is no room in the prison so they can serve their sentence
outside. And the majority of these crooks then go abroad, and then it is
bye bye, we never see them again.
….. The right system is so crooked!
There is nowhere in the world to find a company
that lies the most, cheats fellow men, engages in white-collar crime, harasses
innocent people and wrongs the bourgeoisie such as the Justice, Police, and
And keep this in mind, “how braver the
spirit the crueler the beast”, so never trust an official, even if he is a
beloved relative, because if it is made for a choice, then “one often
chooses eggs for his money and you are betrayed where you stand.”
Civil servants are the sworn slave extensions of
the government, representing on behalf of this authority a legal form of
oppression (legitimacy) and mental violence towards residents.
… And the government knows exactly what people
they choose and educate for the execution of their duties.
… These are mostly inexperienced insensitive
career-oriented young people and hard-hearted dash fighters with no life
experience, who are so conceited to think they have the truth.
… Most of them are ruthless government
employees who often make ordinary citizens unbearable with their employer’s
In addition to this, most civil servants
normally permit themselves to be above the law whereby ignorant are the hare
and often do not realize that their rights are structurally taken away from
them by these bastards.
… And in the knowledge of their rights, a
legion of citizens do not know where to turn, because of the almost
impenetrable jungle in the costly regulations that the government has raised in
order to make it as difficult as possible for the unfortunate citizen because
fetching their rights will cost the government money.
… This means that 80% of the bourgeoisie, the
injustice that they regularly undergo, by the civil service and the Christian
government, let themselves happen by impotence like in a film. And the
government does nothing to prevent this injustice to its citizens.
As already mentioned above, the vast majority of
the bourgeoisie in the lower class of society often leave their rights unused
because of the time-consuming and burdensome road to be completed that the
poorer citizen can not honor due to personal circumstances.
… Ignorance and pride also play a very
important role here, but mainly because of the often inhuman long-winded and
tantalous tormenting barrier of rules and laws of the authority, to which the
common man, in general, cannot comply because of lack of resources.
… The result is that the deprived citizen lags
behind with the stress and profound resentment towards the government and
… Then the revenge comes, hidden in civil
disobedience, vandalism and malice against the government and its organs.
And if the policy of the authoritative power is
scrutinized, then it is almost impossible for anyone to see that the government
has made it very easy for itself in every respect.
… But for the bourgeoisie, this laziness means
an insurmountable reality in a maze of government rules and hazy measures of
government, which is in fact characteristic of the Christian democratic society.
… The tax authorities make it very easy for
everyone to say, but the opposite is very clear.
An official will always obey the law until he
himself becomes the target of his superiors, or as soon as he dares to crawl
through the loopholes of the law in order to be better off or inexorably
discarded by the system, then he or she is also finally “the dick.”
… And when the demise of a civil servant has
taken place, his eyes are automatically opened with the realization that she or
he has been dealing with inhumanities for the authoritative third.
… But as long as an official is not deceived,
he will experience his government position as one of the elects of the system.
In a democracy such as is common in the
western world, the legal system does not take it too closely with the discovery
of truth, because the average citizen is regularly pushed into the shit as much
as possible through judicial bias so that no escape is possible for the person
… It is widely known that bodies can, as a
rule, be annoying about a case so that someone is found guilty a priori before
a court judgment has been pronounced. And this is highly unjust.
Furthermore, the government regularly advertise
through the media that the police is the best friend of the population, but it
does not say that this companionship is only when it suits the police and
… Police officials have been so drilled to
serve government interests in the first place, but the bourgeoisie is of
inferior importance to them.
So the workers’ guild, who is in the service of
justice and the government, is, in essence, an awful people, who, together with
the government apparatus, is not there for the bourgeoisie as is often thought.
… This is evidenced by the way in which the majority
in employment do not deal humanely with their service vis-à-vis the civilian
… So they are as unreliable as the Bible.
And even though the government is drowning that
the police and the judiciary are responsible for the safety and protection of
the population and the country’s interests, but rest assured 100% that the
intended safety and protection, as a rule, can only be sought in favor of their
bosses, this is the government and justice, and the bourgeoisie must legally
pay the bill.
Even now innocent people are resolutely fastened
and tried, despite circumstantial evidence, while the Ministry of Justice
hypocritically looks the other way.
… And in case of acquittal of their victim
there will again be very briefly sprinkled with taxpayers’ money (compensation) and thus they think they have alleviated
the pain of their judicial error.
It has also been found on several occasions that
arrested persons who had previously been found innocent were taken prisoner (prisoner of justice) but were later released prematurely.
… But they have never had their freedom owed
to the police or the justice department, but to those who have worked hard to
provide the exculpatory evidence in which someone’s innocence is certain.
In addition, the Ministry of Justice never
initially takes into account the personal pain and immaterial damage it has
caused to the environment and personal privacy of their victim as if this were
the most normal thing in the world.
… This course of events is still happening
But who will then judge the police, the
employees of the Public Prosecution Service, the prosecutor, and judges, who
have deliberately committed faults, pleaded guilty and eagerly punished without
having taken note of the correctness of the police and the public ministry and
the charges, explanations, and information?
If the government wants to get everything right
on track in a society where it is claimed to be able to live carefree in a
democratic constitutional state, then, in any case, an independent authority
must be set up to detect and rigorously punish wrong officials without respect
of persons, because nobody is inviolable.
It is of great importance to everyone that the
civil service, police, and judges should take into account every human life and
not throw it away, but dedicate itself to the discovery of truth for the
benefit of everyone.
There must be laws in which employees of the
police and the judiciary do not enjoy immunity, but are punishable when dealing
with criminal cases.
… This means that the parties involved must
suffer the same amount of punishment as the innocent person who has been
punished so that the Justice and their staff will from now on deal less
nonchalantly with criminal cases in which the life of the person is central.
So when an innocent person has been innocent
from the day of arrest to his release, then all those involved who have been
guilty of this by carelessness must also undergo the same punishment, in this
case, the judges and the relevant police officers.
…. And with regard to the question of guilt,
it makes no difference whether one is guilty or not, because justice often
knows how to get her right without proof.
… The judiciary is able to motivate the facts
and circumstances of the alleged crime and the involvement of the suspect in
such a way and to subordinate them to this motivation so that the innocent
arrested person is lawfully found guilty and wrongly tried.
… In addition, in a constitutional state in
which one shields itself with equal rights, it certainly asserts that everyone
has the right to a second chance. But this second possibility is limited only
to their Bible and law books.
In other words, a second chance is an illusion,
because in this Christian society the one who has made a mistake in the past
and has improved his life is not allowed to make a restart and to leave the
past behind him so that the past does not continue to pursue him or her.
… A presumption is legally no proof, but once
a thief, always a thief.
… The harsh reality shows that an ex-convict
after his detention life is often made very difficult in society. Are this
mercy and Christianity! No, but this is the ultimate in barbarism, hypocrisy,
When it comes to facts, I hear annoyingly the
cries of a legion of good people around me about “Confucius said this …,
Einstein said that … or the famous sage Plato said this … Aristotle said
that … or Freud finds that …, or Gandhi has said …, Buddha has told …
or according to the Bible and Jesus …, the Koran says …, is in the Torah
…, the Vedas describes …, the Tripitaka dissected … etc … etc., but
they never say anything about the original truths, which appear in a twisted
form in the so-called holy books and were used by former philosophers, must be
regarded directly as originating from the ordinary illiterate population of
In other words, the so-called smart guys, sages,
saints and other scholars in history, have formulated the knowledge of the
common man in their own words and recorded in writing.
… In fact, the experienced scholars have
invented the wheel one by one or invented the black yarn after the white yarn
was already there.
Nowadays, this ingenuity still follows the
planologists and round-the-clockers of this time who time and time again
reinvent the wheel and record it according to self-styled formulas.
… It is, therefore, no wonder that natural
formulas that have moved formerly gifted civilizations into solidarity and
unity, who unfortunately have fallen prey to decadence, are present in twisted
forms at the present time.
… And this deformation has resulted in the
opposite, as happened with “justice”, which had to be replaced by
legitimacy by the interested ruling class.
… And this regularity system is consolidated
in the present time and in every form of civilization, and also interwoven with
its seemingly democratic laws and regulations that the constitutional
authorities now use arbitrarily to their own benefit, but to the detriment of
the bourgeoisie and the society as a whole.
… They say justice, but they mean regularity
that they also eagerly apply to whom they want and wherever they want.
LAWFULNESS AND JUSTICE
Justice and Lawfulness are concepts that are
often confused by arbitrary parties and usually used interchangeably, but there
are indeed differences in the meaning of these words and the executive power is
Legality is a legal term and indicates that
activities and practices are in accordance with applicable rules and
… Legality, legal validity are covered by
established laws and regulations that have been fabricated by the government
and other legal bodies for a so-called well-running society.
… The term legitimacy is used in the legal
world in the broadest sense of the word, while in a financial and/ or material
context, the term legitimacy is used at the government level.
Justice comes from a personal attitude to life
and based on honest action, without regard to persons. The strength of justice
is derived from an honest method of thinking and acting.
… When a tormentor plagues a person at school
and the victim reflects this bullying, which creates a quarrel, the respondent
cannot be punished for his part in the quarrel. This is justice.
… But the one who deserves punishment is he or
she, who started with the bullying and gave rise to the quarrel, this is
… But if both ruffians are punished uniformly,
this is a legitimate act and, apart from that, unjust, unfairly.
… But suppose that as a result of the quarrel
the harasser attacks his victim for the purpose of injuring him or causing physical
injury, but that the defender then defends himself with a detrimental
consequence for the attacker who has a bloody nose, then the attacked person,
in that case, is still immune and not punishable.
… The tormentor himself is responsible for his
own bloody nose and still deserves punishment if there is a penalty for
quarreling at school.
… And this comes under justice because who
burns his buttocks must sit on his blisters.
… That the harasser or assailant injured by
his harassment does not suddenly make him the victim as a result of his own
harassing behavior so that the other person gets the blame and is punished?
… If this were the case, it would be unjust
and legally lawful. This lawfulness is interwoven into laws and incorporated
into the rules of the rule of law and downright unfair.
… But it will soon be different when the
bullied person physically attacks his tormentor in order to teach him ways. No
one has the right to physically attack or threaten the other by using force.
… Bullying is also a form of violence, namely
mental violence, but it does not create physical pain in that other person.
… When a tormentor bullies another verbal,
this verbal is violence and very irritating, but no one gives rise to a
… in short; … Anyone who attacks someone
else while there is no physical danger to him or her is wrong.
Another example of justice is if I were to
witness a brawl where one of the fighters, in this case, the attacker, dies or
is severely injured by the other’s blows, I would be on the side of the one,
who did not start the fight, but wanted to avoid it.
… The defender was forced into a fight by the
agitator, and everyone has the right to self-defense.
… That the fight, unfortunately, went
wrong for that attacker, he or she had to blame for himself. And when this
incident comes to justice and a lawsuit follows, I would immediately sign up as
a witness in favor of the victor.
… I would make it clear to the judge who
started the fight, and whoever hit the other first is wrong. But if this case
were to remain unnoticed by the Ministry of Justice, I would also be silent in
all directions and not tell anyone what I saw.
… I will not tell the judge that the defender
has answered the blows of the attacker firmly. So I do not
lie when I do not tell the judge that the defender has or has not beaten, but I
just do not tell, and that’s my right.
… That the attacked fiercely answered the
blows of the attacker with setbacks, I will not tell the judge. So I do not lie
when I do not tell the judge that the defender has or has not been beaten back.
… I just do not tell, and that’s my right.
This is because it is irrelevant to provide information to the judge whether or
not the attacked has repelled, because “parrying an attack” is
self-evident and falls within the category self-defense, and is therefore not a
point of discussion.
… In that case, I did not perceive the beating
rain of the defender, because the public ministry and the judiciary would like
to exaggerate lawfully and misunderstand the defendant’s self-defense and turn
it into a criminal offense.
… The attacked person in no way deserves
punishment, but the attacker does, even if it is almost beaten to death or is
seriously injured in the hospital.
… And if the attacker dies as a result of his
injuries, he remains responsible for his own death. It is a pity, but then he
should not have attacked the other who wanted to avoid a fight.
… The loser of the fight should have known
better and this also justifies his death. Own fault!
… I only plead for a fair course of affairs
such as in this case, where the attacked person, when he saw that the attacker
was on the ground could no longer defend himself, also stopped his defense and
ran away. He has thus acted justly and is allowed to go free.
… But it would be different if the defender
had attacked his assailant, who was defenseless and bleeding on the ground, but
this part of the fight would no longer be just but unjust.
then, I would also indicate with my testimony, so that legality runs its course
and the alleged conqueror can undergo partial injustice.
… Justice also fits in a situation when
someone is being attacked by several persons and the victim, therefore, uses an
object to repel his assailants. That is also his right to self-defense against
a malicious force, then the defender can go on until the attackers flee or are
eliminated. And when wounded and dead from it, this is all under the
responsibility of the scum. Then they should have stayed away from the other
with their claws.
Of course, the police and the judiciary are very
different about this, but that is not surprising because they are calibrated to
regularity, law, and injustice.
they are unexpectedly confronted with malice in human form on a dark night or
become victims of robbery and physical violence, they will beep differently.
But this kind of guests is anxiously avoiding the dark because she is well
aware of her own dubious career practices where the danger of reprisal by the
injured is lurking because one is not the other.
And under justice, a constitutional state generally
understands lawfulness, while these
two concepts are diverse in legal power.
The Vishnuh-Society has traditionally been
calibrated to justice, take this as it is, it is like or not.
… You do not see us in the dark, but we are
Sa pienti sat est.
By Gurubesar: Lancar Ida-Bagus